Komi-san wa Komyushou Desu.

You need to log in to comment.

Ch. 175 - Four leaf clover
Avatar
A repost of the title track in better audio quality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JkWLGrtJuU

I'm very glad someone enjoyed it

Last edited 2 mo ago by DjAlexDubCheck.

Avatar
Π»Π°Π΄Π½ΠΎ
Avatar
Ρ…ΠΌΠΌ
Avatar
@DjAlexDubCheck Great track choice (Nicole Willis & The Soul Investigators - My Four Leaf Clover). Seriously, not only a perfect track to go along with the chapter but a nice throwback album as well! Ya nailed it.
Avatar
@kronix calling people betas in a romance manga comment section. What a time to be alive ?
Avatar
Ρ…ΠΌΠΌΠΌ
Avatar
THIS IS A GOOD CHAPTER. YES.
Avatar
MY FUCKIN HEART CANT TAKE IT HHNNNGGG
Avatar
Ρ…ΠΌΠΌ
Avatar
Ρ…ΠΌΠΌΠΌΠΌΠΌΠΌΠΌΠΌΠΌ
Avatar
Anyone got any insulin for the diabetes this manga is giving me?

Last edited 4 mo ago by Halfshadows.

Avatar
wait im actually caught up now wtf.... what do i do with my time now
Avatar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1khdKn6baQ

Last edited 3 mo ago by DjAlexDubCheck.

Avatar
What a wholesome chapter. She finally call her onee-san.
Let's see the comment section and just how fluffy it is...

OH MY GOD
Zephyrus
Forum Moderator
Avatar
@boag
Just because @kronix is a troll, that doesn't give you license to break 5.1, Be Civil. People are perfectly capable of putting him on ignore and moving on with their lives. If I see it again or someone reports it, corrective action will be taken.

While I agree that kronix can be an annoying poster, he is ultimately one of the more harmless trolls. He is aware that the second I see him breaking 5.1 or going beyond his IQ draining "when they fuck" comments, he gets comment banned.

The best thing everyone can do is just mute kronix and whoever else that supports him that raises your blood pressure.
Avatar
Interesting, reviewing some of the comments it appears some people haven't seen some of my "serious" comments. Sure, you can disregard my "when they fucking?" comments but when I have a slightly serious tone in MY discussion is because "gasp" they do have some truth to it.

I understand people get caught up in the moment and easily forget things, all I ask of you is to quickly go over the first 50 chapters get a refreshing reread on what this started on.

Come back levelheaded and tell me i am wrong. If you can do that great... If not ignore this message and continue riding on the feelsgoodman wave of never-romance-forgotten-main-characters-supporting-character-has-more-romance-than-main-character-and-introducing-loli-x-girl-for-fluffy-reading that has become of this story. ?

Last edited 4 mo ago by kronix.

Avatar
Oh man, I was having fun with the debate ._.

Welp, see you whenever we see each other again then @Glave
Avatar
that was damned cute, onemine know how to handle this...
Avatar
@DANDAN_THE_DANDAN

Avatar
@Tikibo Nope, I'm just playing devil's advocate cause it's more fun. Reply back to me with an argument if you wanna continue the debate, otherwise just ignore this reply. I just like debates.

Don't take my arguments seriously, I'm just looking for fun.

@Glave Yeah I pretty much shot myself in the foot with that Wikipedia quote. I was hoping you didn't notice so that I would get an easy win. Continuing with the debate cause you were the only one who responded...

Yes, Wikipedia is not a reliable source but is it really wrong? I'm not defending Wiki as a reliable source but considering that wiki's definition is a commonly-accepted one; judging from the fact that even if anyone could've edit to change it, the definition is still there which proves that every person who comes across that page has not disagreed enough to bother altering the definition; I'd say that it is good enough considering this is not a formal debate.

Yes, I cherry-picked. However I did so only because all other definitions available on the first page of Google either point out the same thing but paraphrased or does not fit the context of the argument. I dove in deeper to prove my point that the manga does not mirror the tags' true image.

And here's the elephant in the room. You pointed out that the tags are to represent part of the manga and not its whole. Well, by definition, that means that in order to represent a part of something you must not offend the whole. Like, you can't put a monkey's heart into a shark, right?

As for the evidence to my claim, I shall bring back my points: the romance does not include the two main characters, the comedy is not true because it is only wholesome rather than funny and built upon cliches, the 4-koma... well I gotta give that one to you because the 4-koma part does not offend the manga's mixed panels - it mixes 4-koma into part of its varied amount of panel layouts, same goes for school-life as well.

Last edited 4 mo ago by DANDAN_THE_DANDAN.

Read older comments